OPINION: Lamb Clear Cut Winner in Hopkinton Debate
LAMB FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE
For Immediate Release
October 16, 2012
Contact: 617-513-4368
LAMB CLEAR CUT WINNER IN HOPKINTON DEBATE
DYKEMA RUNS AWAY FROM RECORD AND STILL EMBRACES HIGHER TAXES
Holliston, MA ...Today Marty Lamb, Republican candidate for State Representative in the Eighth Middlesex District, responded to comments made by incumbent Carolyn Dykema during the Hopkinton Cable debate.
During the debate Rep. Dykema claimed not to have received support from the SEIU in the past or present. The facts don't support her claim. The following was written in the Milford Daily News: "They were also helped by thousands more in independent expenditures from the Massachusetts Teacher's Association and Service Employees International Union, as was Carolyn Dykema, the new state representative from Holliston.
This year Dykema was listed in the Election Edition of the SEIU mailer.
Several times during the debate Dykema was on the hot seat due to her record of voting 95.37% of the time with the Speaker. One of her defenses was that she voted for "thoughtful legislation that helps the district." Her votes during the rules debate were 100% with the Speaker. They were hardly thoughtful. She voted against:
- Requiring a roll call vote be taken on any bill that would raise taxes
- Requiring equal membership between the 2 parties of the Ethics Committee making it nonpartisan
- Requiring the Ethics Committee file reports with Clerk on the outcome of complaints
- Limiting the ability to kill amendments with study committee votes
- Requiring 24 hours between a bill being reported out of committee and it going to the floor for a vote. (being able to read the bill before a vote)
"I don't think keeping the public in the dark or rushing to vote on bills before they are read is thoughtful or helpful to the district," said Lamb.
During the debate Dykema abandoned her voting record by claiming she now supports posting committee votes online. However, it should be noted that she voted against this common sense rules reform not once but twice, so it is hard to believe that her debate statement was nothing more than pandering.
Dykema also tried to defend her record of voting with the Speaker 95.37% of the time by claiming that Republicans vote more often with their leader. There is one major glaring problem with that claim. All of the Republicans vote 40 to 55% of the time with the Speaker. They actually cross the aisle. On the other hand Carolyn has only crossed the aisle 4.63%.
Despite claiming to get results and being a member of the majority party, Dykema admitted that she could not get her amendment to the casino bill approved. In contrast, freshmen Republican Representatives have passed more significant legislation in the past two years than Dykema.
When it came to the issue of taxes, Dykema once again embraced her vote of increasing the sales tax. Moreover, she stated she doesn't favor cutting taxes. Lamb challenged her on a statement she made during last week's debate claiming there are $27 billion in tax expenditures.
"Our state takes in about $28 billion in tax revenue. To suggest that there are $27 billion in business tax loopholes is false. She is not advocating closing tax loopholes at all. She would be creating new taxes on things that are presently exempt from taxation such as food and clothing," said Lamb. "That's not a loophole but a new tax."
Dykema said the following during the Holliston debate:
"One of the things I think we really need to look at is the tax expenditure budget, which has been looked at the last couple of years. There was a study done that showed that there were a lot of loopholes being offered to specific industry groups or special interests that have accumulated over the years and the net effect has been that we actually forgo as much as tax revenue- $27 billion to these tax loopholes as we actually bring in in revenue which is just over that so we need to take a hard look at these to see if there might be opportunity to be a little more fair in how we tax everyone across the Commonwealth."
The study Rep. Dykema is referring to said there were "$17.2 billion in sales tax exemptions such as breaks on food, clothing and soda."
"Rep. Dykema is very misguided to think that there is $27 billion in tax loopholes. Moreover, the term tax expenditure is a misnomer. In layman's terms it means new taxes," said Lamb.
Overall Lamb had more specifics when it came to education, controlling state spending, and reviving the economy.
Mr. Lamb, a Massachusetts native, graduated from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University in 1985 and received his Bachelor of Arts from Hampshire College in 1982. He has an extensive background in real estate law, formerly with Adelson, Golden & Loria, P.C., Edward A. Sokoloff & Associates and Lamb and Browne, P.C., is currently with Lamb and Associates, P.C. He is a member of the Real Estate Bar Association of Massachusetts. An active participant in community affairs, Mr. Lamb sits on the Board of Directors of New England Region of United Synagogue and is a past president of Temple Beth Torah in Holliston. He has also served on the Holliston Elementary School Council and the Campaign for Holliston Schools. He resides in Holliston with Peri, his wife of 22 years and his two daughters Elissa and Simma.
For more information on Marty's candidacy, voters can visit his website at ElectMartyLamb.com or follow him on Twitter at @ElectMartyLamb and Facebook at Elect Marty Lamb.
###
Karen Adamson
5:12 am on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Mr. Lamb spoke with authority and clarity on a number of subjects. He had plans, depth, ideas, solutions. It was quite a contrast to the incumbent, and a refreshing change for sure.
Mindy Katz
8:02 am on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
What a great debate. The questions were right on target. I thought it was a bit off-putting when, called on her 95% voting record with the Speaker, Carolyn's only comeback was putting up the voting record of the Republican reps. already in office. Ms. Dykema, you are not running against those other Republicans. You are running against Mr. Lamb AND trying to run away from your own voting record.
Ann Green
9:41 am on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
In this state it's all about party. People simply have to get over their thinking that Republicans can do no right and Democrats can do no wrong. Our high taxes, over-regulation, poor climate for business and kowtowing to unions are all the result of our being a one-party state. Mr. Lamb is a breath of fresh air with business experience.
Cynthia Cox
11:06 am on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Ms. Dykema raised taxes and was asked by the panel if she regretted raising the sales tax. I was amazed to hear her defend it. She doesn't realize so many of us flock to the stores on sales tax free weekend for a reason. We are burdened by this and many other taxes. She voted against the meals tax holiday, too, and that would help us and small business restaurants. She voted to double tax alcohol. She has a habit of raising taxes. This is the worst thing to do in a suffering economy.
K Napolitano
11:18 am on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Dykema is now adopting Marty's position of posting committee votes online after being embarrassed in the Hopkinton debate. She voted 100% with the Speaker during rules debate on making the ethics committee partisan. She voted with the Speaker to raise our taxes. She voted with the speaker not once, but twice against posting committee votes online. She voted with the Speaker to cut special education funding.
Gina Sabin
12:35 pm on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Mr. Lamb's experience as a small business owner and his common sense approach and answers related to me really well. He knows what we have to deal with. He lives and works and supports a family and understands firsthand. I so appreciate his focus on jobs and his ideas to promote job growth in the private sector. Beacon Hill hasn't done it. Lamb's proposals and solutions have meaning and are understandable and reasonable. They are things both sides of the aisle can agree on, and that's how things get done.
Joe Barbieri
12:41 pm on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Lamb has useful plans to control wasteful spending. He brought up a number of ways to reform government. He's certainly done his homework, and he's been doing this for quite a while. He also spoke about the New Jobs For Massachusetts org he has been part of, and their website shows a number of initiatives they've taken, and worked with the Small Business caucus on Beacon Hill. He's already been doing it, working with other legislators. Ms. Dykema refused to be part of this caucus. It shows Lamb certainly already doing a lot as a citizen with his small business experience to work with legislators from his position in this organization to put forth reforms that make this state run better.
Karen Adamson
12:54 pm on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
I like Marty Lamb's speaking from the heart. He says what he believes and it's genuine. He's not there to be a career politician. He's there to help bring private sector job growth, reforms, real ideas and changes that can be made. He's a person who cares about the state we live in and wants to help make things better. I applaud it.
SJohnson
1:51 pm on Wednesday, October 17, 2012
If you want fresh ideas or someone who isn't beholden to a soul, then vote for Marty Lamb. I like what I've read in his literature, especially his newspaper!!! Out with the old, in with the new.
Darlene Hayes
10:19 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
Wow, you must have watched a different debate than me.
I saw Marty stumble when asked about special interest support from a group in Marlboro. I saw Marty stumble having no idea what committees he would want to serve on. He did not state one thing revealing any committed community service over the many years he has lived & has a business in Holliston, he doesnt have a proven track record as a community servant now and dont expect it would change in the future. Only 4 town mtgs in 17 years is disgraceful. He may have ideas but he does not have plans. When asked to actually explain one at the debate referred to wasted state land that could be repurposed that he noticed driving to the Cape, I believe even the mc smirked about the land he may be referencing is wetlands. Mr Lamb did have twenty pages of blog comments, name called out a supporter for Ms Dykema and see more of this harsh, negative name callling posts coming from the Lamb supporters many who dont live in this district including Ms Awiszio who submitted this.