Marty Lamb Announces Support of State House Ethics Reform
Candidate for State Rep., Marty Lamb, endorsed Tom Keyes' plan for Ethics Reform in the State House.
Courtesy Elect Marty Lamb
On Monday, in front of the State House as the Senate prepares to debate the budget this week Marty Lamb, Republican candidate for the State Representative in the 8th Middlesex District, endorsed Tom Keyes' Legislative Integrity Plan.
"When the public doesn't know what is happening at the State House, corruption is allowed to creep in. The Keyes plan will require more transparency and greater accountability," said Lamb. "My opponent, Carolyn Dykema, has voted against requiring the full audit of the legislature. I think the taxpayers have a right to know how their tax dollars are being spent. In 2010 both Suzanne Bump and Mary Connaughton endorsed the proposal for a full audit. It is disappointing that Dykema is so partisan she won't allow for an audit."
"I am pleased that Marty Lamb also recognizes the importance of demanding transparency at the State House. We need to elect more people who will fight for ethics reform. The people of Massachusetts deserve better," said Keyes who is running against Senate President Therese Murray. Professionally Keyes is an ethics, compliance and efficiency consultant.
This week the Senate will debate the state's $32 billion budget. Just like the Senate, the House is not an open process. Legislators are only given a few days submit amendments and then far too many of them are bundled so the public has no clue as to what is being passed. The budget is passed on to the conference committee with these huge bundled amendments to negotiate behind closed doors. The public is purposely kept in the dark.
Not only does Lamb want to clean up the legislative process but he also wants to improve transparency and the integrity of the legislature.
The Keyes to Good Government Plan includes:
- End the legislative exemption from the public records law.
- Prohibit the passage of controversial items at informal sessions. Once a Senator or Representative has submitted a written objection to the respective leaders of their chamber, then that item cannot be taken up during an informal session. In previous years, Senator Murray tried to push through the controversial wind energy bill during informal session.
- Require the State Auditor to conduct a comprehensive audit of the legislature yearly.
- Stop the bundling of amendments. This will create more transparency within the legislative process and within our state budgets.
- End the legislative exemption for the Open Meeting Law.
- End the legislative exemption from the Fair Procurement Law.
- Require bills to be in print and online for 72 hours before voting on them. Last year the final version of the state budget was passed at the last minute. After it emerged from the Conference Committee, the bill was not in print for 72 hours.
- Subject the judiciary branch to the public records law for administrative records only.
- Require the Ethics Committee to be bi-partisan. Right now the membership of the Ethics Committee is bi-partisan but is dominated by the majority party. Keyes wants equal membership for the two parties. This will ensure accountability for legislators rather partisan perfunctory investigations. As it stands now the committee is just a rubber stamp for the majority party.
- Prohibit legislative members from serving in a leadership role if he or she has been indicted. After Senator Jim Marzilli was accused of sexual assault, he was allowed to collect his extra pay as Chairman for months.
- Require that committee votes are recorded and published online.
- Prohibit felons from collecting pensions while incarcerated.
- Reform the public records law so the Governor's administration and state agencies have to comply not avoid it. The Pioneer Institute has long complained about the lack of compliance with the public records law. "Simple requests can take a year or more to fulfill, search and reproduction fees climb into the thousands of dollars and government offices claim dubious exemption all leaving the public in the dark and denying their basic right to know."