patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Marty Lamb Announces Support of State House Ethics Reform

Candidate for State Rep., Marty Lamb, endorsed Tom Keyes' plan for Ethics Reform in the State House.

 

Courtesy Elect Marty Lamb

On Monday, in front of the State House as the Senate prepares to debate the budget this week Marty Lamb, Republican candidate for the State Representative in the 8th Middlesex District, endorsed Tom Keyes' Legislative Integrity Plan.

"When the public doesn't know what is happening at the State House, corruption is allowed to creep in. The Keyes plan will require more transparency and greater accountability," said Lamb. "My opponent, Carolyn Dykema, has voted against requiring the full audit of the legislature. I think the taxpayers have a right to know how their tax dollars are being spent. In 2010 both Suzanne Bump and Mary Connaughton endorsed the proposal for a full audit. It is disappointing that Dykema is so partisan she won't allow for an audit." 

"I am pleased that Marty Lamb also recognizes the importance of demanding transparency at the State House. We need to elect more people who will fight for ethics reform. The people of Massachusetts deserve better," said Keyes who is running against Senate President Therese Murray. Professionally Keyes is an ethics, compliance and efficiency consultant.

This week the Senate will debate the state's $32 billion budget. Just like the Senate, the House is not an open process. Legislators are only given a few days submit amendments and then far too many of them are bundled so the public has no clue as to what is being passed. The budget is passed on to the conference committee with these huge bundled amendments to negotiate behind closed doors. The public is purposely kept in the dark.

Not only does Lamb want to clean up the legislative process but he also wants to improve transparency and the integrity of the legislature.

The Keyes to Good Government Plan includes:

  1. End the legislative exemption from the public records law.
  2. Prohibit the passage of controversial items at informal sessions. Once a Senator or Representative has submitted a written objection to the respective leaders of their chamber, then that item cannot be taken up during an informal session. In previous years, Senator Murray tried to push through the controversial wind energy bill during informal session.
  3. Require the State Auditor to conduct a comprehensive audit of the legislature yearly.
  4. Stop the bundling of amendments. This will create more transparency within the legislative process and within our state budgets.
  5. End the legislative exemption for the Open Meeting Law.
  6. End the legislative exemption from the Fair Procurement Law.
  7. Require bills to be in print and online for 72 hours before voting on them. Last year the final version of the state budget was passed at the last minute. After it emerged from the Conference Committee, the bill was not in print for 72 hours.
  8. Subject the judiciary branch to the public records law for administrative records only.
  9. Require the Ethics Committee to be bi-partisan. Right now the membership of the Ethics Committee is bi-partisan but is dominated by the majority party. Keyes wants equal membership for the two parties. This will ensure accountability for legislators rather partisan perfunctory investigations. As it stands now the committee is just a rubber stamp for the majority party.
  10. Prohibit legislative members from serving in a leadership role if he or she has been indicted. After Senator Jim Marzilli was accused of sexual assault, he was allowed to collect his extra pay as Chairman for months.
  11. Require that committee votes are recorded and published online.
  12. Prohibit felons from collecting pensions while incarcerated.
  13. Reform the public records law so the Governor's administration and state agencies have to comply not avoid it. The Pioneer Institute has long complained about the lack of compliance with the public records law. "Simple requests can take a year or more to fulfill, search and reproduction fees climb into the thousands of dollars and government offices claim dubious exemption all leaving the public in the dark and denying their basic right to know."
Related Topics: marty lamb

MReed

3:16 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Marty Lamb has excellent insight into these problems with the legislature. There is too much back room wheeling and dealing going on and no accountability. We need the transparency. Marty Lamb recognizes what's needed to bring ethics reform and shine a bright light on everything that's done and hidden from the public. We need these ethics reform changes. Thank you, Marty Lamb for SUPPORTING US !!

Reply

JKelley

4:00 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Dykema voted against these Ethics Reforms when they have come up. She wants to hide this activity from citizens. Dykema doesn't want transparency. She's part of the problem on Beacon Hill. She has not done anything to help clean up this process. She has done nothing but defend the cloak of secrecy ! Time for her to go.

Reply

Mark Schultz

5:39 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I find it interesting that "The Patch" has reported essentially the same story in 3 versions, issued by Republican candidates. MReed and JKelly would support anything Mr. Lamb says without questioning it. Let's take a look at it.
Point#2 could give a single Rep or Sen. way to much authority to control the agenda. #9 is a political power grab by a minority party. Proportional representation on committees works on national levels why not here. In fact if you want REAL reform make it an independent citizens commission with NO party ties. Point #10 violates the US Constitution. Any one can be accused of anything, you can't penalize until a trial has convicted. Point#13 is vague and nonenforceable.
Ms. Dykema has always been open and transparent and expects the same of those around her. This is a flawed proposal, there may be good parts to it but serious problems in some areas. Falling in lock step with anything blindly is hardly a good idea. The fact that Mr. Lamb supports it without question makes me wonder what other important questions he won't ask?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JKelley

10:18 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

These Ethics Reforms are excellent and much needed. Jim Marzilli collected his extra pay for months and didn't show up. No one has a constitutional rght to extra pay. Clearly, you don't understand informal session. Informal sessions are for passing non-controversial items. Yet, there have been times when things have been snuck through. The public has a right to know.

Balance on the Ethics Committee is good for both parties. Was the State Rep from Braintree punished for his inappropriate conduct last year? No.

And as for the last point, I highly doubt you know how long it takes for the Patrick administration to fulfill a FOIA request. It is not 10 days as required by law. It is over 90 days if not lost.

If you look beyond your political slant, you would know that this proposal would benefit everyone in MA. These Ethics Reforms are very much needed.

Comment_arrow

Kelly Roney

10:53 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

No one wants to defend Marzilli at this point, but we still have innocent until proven guilty as a core principle in this country. Those of us who actually support the Constitution, like Mark and me, still defend that principle.

Kelly Roney

3:43 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Informal session functions on the consent of the body, meaning that if one legislator present objects, the measure doesn't pass.

I'd be opposed to allowing any legislator to mail in objections and thereby obstruct the body's operation. It's good for the Commonwealth that a legislator has to show up to voice that objection. Otherwise, there's the potential for a single legislator to obstruct every action.

Reply

Kelly Roney

10:55 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Government officials who commit felonies in the course of their duties lose their pensions entirely, not just while in prison but after as well.

Reply

Leave a comment